shutterstock_526229560-e1609360188875.jpg

The 20 Worst Places to Live in New Jersey

Newark

New Jersey’s beaches, midlands, and mountains are beautiful. They attract millions of tourists every year. Some of those tourists end up becoming so enamored by the attractions of the Garden State, they never leave.

Which is understandable… New Jersey has a lot of great things going for it. But nowhere is completely immune to problems, New Jersey included. For every exclusive, glitzy beachside community, there’s a trouble spot.

In some of New Jersey’s less salubrious destinations, unemployment and poverty rates are skyrocketing, while crime, drug dealing, and other nefarious activities are getting worse by the day.

If you’re considering packing up and heading to New Jersey, there are a few places you might want to think long and hard about before moving in. To help you narrow down your options, we’ve rounded up the 20 worst places to live in New Jersey.

Here, in ascending order, they are.

Buena

20. Buena

When it comes to crime, Buena isn’t actually doing too badly at all. In fact, it’s doing very well for itself, with statistics putting its crime rate at almost 32% lower than the national average.

So, why has it made our list? Because simply put, a good crime rate is about the only positive thing Buena has going for it. The unemployment is one of the worst in the state, the median income is among the lowest, and the median home value of just $180,600 smacks of a place no one wants to invest in.

Penns Grove

19. Penns Grove

Penns Grove is a town in trouble. Its crime rate is a massive 73.14% higher than the US national average. Almost a third of its population lives below the poverty line.

Its schools are some of the worst founded and worst-performing in the state. Unemployment is a giant 18%. The median income, by contrast, is a tiny $34,500. It’s poor, it’s dispirited, and it’s in desperate need of a good-news day.

Salem

18. Salem

Affordability might be nice, but you have to question the desirability of a place where the average home sells for just $86,000. Salem is just such a place.

Spend a little time here, and you’ll soon understand why no one is prepared to pay a decent price for a home. For a start, there’s nothing here.

Secondly, the job market is about as buoyant as a dead fish. Thirdly, 41.3% of the population lives below the poverty line. Fourthly, the median income is a minute $24,841. We could go on, but Salem clearly has enough problems to deal with without us adding to its woes.

Jersey City

17. Jersey City

Jersey City isn’t all bad, but it’s far from ideal. One of its worst crimes is the work/life balance it offers its residents. According to gobankingrates.com, it has the 3rd worst work/life balance in the country.

Most residents spend almost 40 minutes commuting to work, leaving them little chance to enjoy the fruits of their labor…although considering that extends to a rather low median income of $62,739, maybe that’s not as bad as it seems.

16. Asbury Park

Asbury Park isn’t a place that could truthfully advertise itself as desirable. Incomes are low and unemployment rates are rocketing by the day. And as for the crime rate, it’s bad and getting worse.

As app.com reports, gun shootings have surged in the past few years, with police blaming the increasing trend for young men, many of whom have had difficult upbringings, to join street gangs and settle disputes with guns.

“These kids don’t have a direction,” Officer Butkoff tells the publication, adding “I don’t think they fully understand the danger they are creating.”

Laurel Lake

15. Laurel Lake

Laurel Lake… sounds idyllic, doesn’t it? It’s not. With one of the lowest median home values in New Jersey, a depressingly high poverty and unemployment rate, and a median income that comes in way below the national average, this isn’t the kind of place that many of us would choose to live willingly.

Trenton

14. Trenton

Trenton isn’t the worst place to live in New Jersey, for sure. New Jersey’s capital is big, bustling, and steeped in history. ​​​​​​Unfortunately, it’s also steeped in plenty of other, less desirable things.

Crime is rife – with a crime rate of 3,217 per 100 thousand residents, your chance of being a victim here is 1 in 32, 29% higher than the US average. And the bad news doesn’t stop there.

The median income is a tiny $34,412 – 38% lower than the US average. The unemployment rate of 10% is 107% higher than the national average, while the median home value of $100,000 is 46% lower than the US average.

Even more worryingly (at least as far as the future of the city is concerned), the high school graduation rate of 66% is a full 20% lower than the US average. School test scores are 65% lower. Time to pull your socks up, Trenton.

Wildwood

13. Wildwood

If you thought small towns were charming, you clearly haven’t come across the likes of Wildwood in your travels. Despite having just 5,042 residents to its names, it’s got more problems than a city three times its size.

For a start, there’s the crime. How many crimes can happen in such a small population, you might ask? Judging by FBI data, an awful lot more than you might think.

According to the statistics, Wildwood is the second biggest hub of crime in New Jersey. If that wasn’t enough for unlucky residents to deal with, they’re also blighted by one of the worst unemployment figures in New Jersey – according to homefacts.com, unemployment hit an all-time of 26.9% in April 2020 before dropping to a slightly lower but still depressing figure in the second half of the year.

Equally depressing (although perhaps unsurprising), almost 20% of the population live below the poverty line. It’s poor, it’s crime-riddled, and all in all, it’s really not the kind of place you want to call home.

Linden

12. Linden

Linden scores dismally across almost every variable. Crime is high (your chance of getting robbed is a massive in 1 in 34.4). The unemployment rate of 7.2% is one of the highest in the state, and the average home price is one of the lowest.

The commuting time is one of the longest in NJ, with most people spending an average 30.60 minutes every day commuting to work.

Vineland

11. Vineland

Vineland has a crime rate of 38 per one thousand residents, giving it one of the highest crime rates in America compared to all communities of all sizes – from the smallest towns to the very largest cities.

Not great, is it, especially when you consider that it gives residents a one in 26 chance of being a victim of either violent or property crime. Unless you like the idea of becoming just another statistic, you might want to choose somewhere else to live.

Atlantic City

10. Atlantic City

Back in 2015, onlyinyourstate.com ranked Atlantic City as one of the most dangerous places in the state. In the five years since, not a lot has improved.

Crime is still rife, problems are escalating, and beneath the glitz and glamour of this popular tourist destination, is a city struggling to find its place.

Woodbine

9. Woodbine

If you like the idea of having a well-paid job, don’t move to Woodbine. Boasting an unemployment rate of a massive 7.9% and a median income of a tiny $36,667, Woodbine’s job market isn’t exactly what you’d describe as hot… something that may or may not explain why over 27% of this small town’s population are living in poverty.

Plainfield

8. Plainfield

Plainfield has 50,362 residents. It’s a regional hub for Central New Jersey and a sleeper suburb of New York. It’s got plenty of recreational opportunities, shops, nightclubs, and bars. The city even has a handful of libraries, galleries, and cultural sights. But that’s where the good news ends.

With an unemployment rate of 7.9%, a median income that just scrapes past the poverty line, and a crime rate that ranks as one of the worst in the state, Plainfield isn’t the kind of place many people would willingly spend their day, let alone their lives.

Long Branch

7. Long Branch

There are worse places to live than Long Branch, but you’ll have your work cut out finding them. After all, how many places can compete with an unemployment rate that’s pushing 8%?

Or a median income that’s one of the lowest in New Jersey? Or a crime rate that gives you a 1 in 48.8 chance of being robbed and a 1 in 279 chance of being attacked, assaulted, raped, or even murdered? Thankfully, not many.

Seabrook Farms

6. Seabrook Farms

Seabrook Farms is one of the worst small towns in New Jersey. It’s not hard to see how they’ve come to their conclusions. For a start, there’s the fact that most households are drawing the tiny median income of $35,083.

Secondly, 34.6% of the population is living in poverty. No matter what else is has going for it, it’s always going to be hard to see the bright side of a town where a third of its residents are struggling to put bread on the table.

Camden

5. Camden

Camden might have enough shops, bars, and restaurants to keep its 74,002 residents entertained, but you’ll find precious few people that can afford to visit them. With an unemployment rate of 12.9% and a median income that ranks way below the national average, most Camden residents can barely afford the necessities of life, let alone the luxuries.

The crime rate is, quite frankly, abysmal, while the fact that 36.4% of the population live below the poverty line is a stain on New Jersey’s conscience.

Egg Harbor City

4. Egg Harbor City

Like the idea of living in a small, friendly, charming town in the Garden State? Then whatever you do, don’t hitch your wagon to Egg Harbor City. It may tick the box on ‘small,’ but as for everything else, forget it.

This small but uncharming town has a dire unemployment rate of over 14%, a poverty rate of almost 20%, and a crime rate that’s 22% above the national average.

If that wasn’t bad enough, there’s basically nothing to do here, with even the most basic kinds of amenities being short on the ground.

Bridgeton

3. Bridgeton

If you want to live somewhere safe and affluent, you might want to give Bridgeton a miss. With the 3rd highest unemployment rate in New Jersey, the 4th lowest median income, and the 8th worst crime rate, it’s not the kind of place many of us would consider desirable. As an added kick in the teeth, the commuting time is one of the longest in the state.

Lindenwold

2. Lindenwold

First up, a positive. Lindenwold doesn’t have the worst crime rate in New Jersey. Its schools are also far better than those in many comparatively sized cities. And there endeth the good news.

The unemployment rate in this city of 17,320 residents is a massive 7%. Median incomes are depressingly low at just $45,789 a year, while the average property price is a tiny $124,200. All in all, Lindenwold is a city that’s in desperate need of a makeover.

Newark

1. Newark

Unless you’re happy to live in a city with one of the worst unemployment rates in New Jersey, you might want to avoid Newark. The largest city in New Jersey is also one of its most jobless – a massive 11.3% of the population is unemployed. Just to put that in perspective, that’s more than double the US average.

Even those lucky enough to have a job aren’t exactly living in style, with most households pulling in the distinctly below-average income of just $35,199 – over $20,000 less than the US average. Crime isn’t quite as bad as it is in some other places, but it still manages to fall within the bottom 5% percent.

You can also read:


Source link

623d34b3f0215.image_.jpg

Flyers’ follies remind Blues fans they had it good for a long time







Philadelphia Flyers vs St. Louis Blues

Blues forward David Perron (57) is pinned to the boards by Philadelphia Flyers defenseman Nick Seeler (24) and Philadelphia Flyers center Morgan Frost (48) in the third period during a regular season NHL game between the Philadelphia Flyers and St. Louis Blues at Enterprise Center in St. Louis on Thursday, March 24, 2022. Photo by David Carson, dcarson@post-dispatch.com




To appreciate the steady success of the Blues prior to this season’s sudden collapse, consider the plight of the once-mighty Philadelphia Flyers.

They have won one playoff round since 2012. This year they will miss the postseason for the seventh time during that span.

Hapless Flyers general manager Chuck Fletcher got the short haircut last week. Daniel Briere will take the helm on an interim basis while ownership maps out a front office makeover.

The franchise is looking outside for a president of hockey operations. While Briere seems likely to have a key role going forward, the team’s Council of Elders — Paul Holmgren, Bobby Clarke, Dean Lombardi and Bill Barber – is in some peril.

The front office operation has been a mess, with infighting between the hockey and business sides and various ex-GMs and ex-coaches jockeying to maintain influence with ownership.

The franchise’s troubles predate Fletcher’s reign of error. For instance, the Flyers picked star-crossed Nolan Patrick over Nico Hischier in the 2017 NHL Draft.

Then-GM Ron Hextall traded Brayden Schenn to the Blues for the Ghost of Jori Lehtera, a first-round pick in 2017 (Morgan Frost) and a first-round pick in 2018 (Joel Farabee).

The hope was that Patrick and Frost would be the long-term 1-2 punch at center. But concussions ruined Patrick’s career and Frost has yet to develop into true Top 6 forward.

So, no, Schenn was not a superfluous player, as Hextall argued at the time.

That disastrous trade helped doom Hextall. Inexplicably, the Flyers replaced him with Fletcher – whom the Minnesota Wild fired for his uneven work in the State of Hockey.

Now the Flyers are in the similar spot as the Blues, but without a recent Stanley Cup to show for their current dilemma and without two young point-per-game forwards to rebuild around.

“We have to be careful. I want to make sure that ‘rebuild’ doesn’t mean fire sale,” Briere said at his introductory news conference. “There’s a big difference between the two. So I want to make that clear. We’re not going get rid of everybody. We have some good players here, some players that are in certain roles that we’re going to keep as well.”

Fletcher took over in 2018, fired coach Dave Hakstol, then ran through coaches Alain Vigneault and former Blues coach Mike Yeo before rolling the dice on old school taskmaster John Tortorella.

Along the way he made some notable blunders:

  • He acquired defenseman Ryan Ellis and his $50 million, eight-year contract from Nashville. Ellis has played four games in two years and faces an uncertain future due to his multi-layered pelvic injury.
  • He spent a 2021 first-round pick (14th overall!) and a 2023 second-round pick to get defensively-challenged defenseman Rasmus Ristolainen from Buffalo.
  • He spent a 2022 second-round pick to convince the Arizona Coyotes to take defenseman Shayne Gostisbehere, who subsequently revived his career.
  • He wasted a second-round pick in 2024, a third-rounder in 2024 and a fourth-rounder in 2022 just for the negotiating rights to defenseman Tony DeAngelo. Given DeAngelo’s extensive baggage, that was an excessive price to pay just to get first crack at him. 
  • Fletcher failed to get a near-term premium draft pick for selling off Claude Giroux at the 2022 trade deadline. Florida gave up a conditional first-round pick that will come in either the 2024 NHL or 2025 NHL Draft. The Panthers also gave up a 2023 third-round pick and young forward Owen Tippett.
  • He failed to get anything for winger James van Riemsdyk and his expiring contract at the most recent trade deadline.

The Flyers aren’t getting a great return on their big contract investments. Ellis may spend the rest of his career on long-term injured reserve and the team hasn’t been getting full value from these contracts:

  • Sean Couturier ($62 million, eight years).
  • Kevin Hayes ($50 million, seven years).
  • Travis Sanheim ($50 million, eight years)
  • Ivan Provorov ($40.6 million, six years).
  • Farabee ($30 million, six years) 
  • Ristolainen ($25.5 million, five years)

All of this spending left the Flyers unable to bid on free-agent forward Johnny Gaudreau, who grew up across the river from Philly in New Jersey. He somehow landed in Columbus instead.

Now the Flyers face tough road ahead. Carter Hart might or might not be the long-term answer in goal. Farabee, Frost and Tippett might or might not develop into impact forwards.

A healthy Couturier is a valuable two-way center, but will he ever get back to full speed? Hayes is a solid player, but how much value does he offer at that price?

Blues fans have been vexed by their team’s sudden downturn and painful sell-off, but it has the Jordan Kyrou/Robert Thomas tandem to build around and a pile of premium draft picks to retool with.

So it could be worse. Just ask Flyers fans.

Sports columnists Ben Frederickson and Jeff Gordon take a break from pondering who could be traded next and when, and turn their attention toward a veteran Blues leader who is performing like you would hope a potential future captain would.


Ben Frederickson


Jeff Gordon


Gary Hairlson




Source link

stephen-a-smith-sean-mcvay-jalen-ramsey.jpg

ESPN analyst has ‘serious questions’ over team’s future after Jalen Ramsey trade

The Los Angeles Rams were on the receiving end of some serious concern from Stephen A. Smith following their trade of Jalen Ramsey.


The Los Angeles Rams, having managed to win their second Super Bowl in franchise history during the 2021 season, found themselves suffering the worst return that a defending Super Bowl has had in the history of the league with their 5-12 record last season.

There were a number of reasons for that, most notably the departures of veteran offensive lineman Andrew Whitworth, wide receiver Odell Beckham Jr and a whole host of coordinators and other members of the coaching staff as they were plucked to take jobs elsewhere.

GiveMeSport VIDEO OF THE DAY

But perhaps more worrying for the Rams was how tough it was going to be to rebuild the playing staff, especially with the team entering the offseason at more than $14m over the salary cap, so in order to make it happen they have had to make some big decisions, such as cutting Bobby Wagner and trading away All-Pro cornerback Jalen Ramsey to the Miami Dolphins.

However, a move like that hasn’t sat well with ESPN analyst Stephen A. Smith.


Stephen A. Smith left worried with the Los Angeles Rams

Speaking on ESPN’s First Take, Smith seemed to think that a move like this, combined with some other things that they have done this offseason, means that the Rams will not be competing for a Super Bowl this season.

Video: Stephen A. Smith discusses the Los Angeles Rams:

Los Angeles Rams not living in LaLa Land anymore

The Rams certainly have to face some harsh truths in the near future as they try to get themselves back to some level of stability, but at the end of the day you have to ask yourself was it worth it? Since Sean McVay took over, he has turned the team into perennial threats, with four trips to the playoffs, two Super Bowl appearances and a Super Bowl win in his six seasons in charge.

That is something that most teams would gladly take over that timespan, and if it means that they have to start over, then it’s probably worth it, at least they have something to show for it (the attitude might have been slightly different if they didn’t win).

Now they just have to hope that the journey back to the top can be as quick as possible, although it certainly won’t be a quick fix by any stretch of the imagination.


Source link

Logo_400x400.jpg

Open Procurement – Small Business Resiliency Network (SBRN) Credit Building Program – Business News Today


Open Procurement – Small Business Resiliency Network (SBRN) Credit Building Program – Business News Today – EIN Presswire


















Trusted News Since 1995

A service for global professionals
·
Tuesday, March 14, 2023

·
622,152,636
Articles


·
3+ Million Readers

News Monitoring and Press Release Distribution Tools

Press Releases

Events & Conferences





Source link

GETTYRF_83022_FaucetWaterDrip699276.jpg

EPA proposes first-ever limit on ‘forever chemicals’ in drinking water

Tim Graham/Getty Images

(WILMINGTON, N.C.) — The Environmental Protection Agency proposed its first-ever rule to reduce the prevalence of PFAS chemicals in drinking water Tuesday, taking the first step to require cities to test for the so-called “forever chemicals.”

“Today, I am thrilled to announce that EPA is taking yet another bold step to protect public health. I’m so proud to announce that EPA is proposing the first ever national standard to protect communities from PFAS in drinking water. This is something that communities like Wilmington have been demanding for years. And today we’re finally answering those calls,” EPA Administrator Michael Regan said at the announcement in Wilmington, North Carolina.

The type of chemicals known as PFAS, short for per- and poly-fluorolalkyl substances, have become ubiquitous in modern life, used in everything from household products like nonstick pans, waterproof clothing and furniture to industrial uses like military-grade firefighting foam and manufacturing. They’re often nicknamed “forever chemicals” because they can stay in the environment or in the human body for a long time once they’re introduced.

The proposed EPA rule will regulate two of the oldest these chemicals — PFOA and PFOS — as well as a mixture of four other chemicals in this category including GenX, which has been detected in the Cape Fear River in North Carolina.

“It’s the resilient and durable qualities that make these chemicals so useful in everyday life. But it’s also what makes them particularly harmful to people in the environment,” Regan said Tuesday. “What began as a so-called miracle groundbreaking technology meant for practicality and convenience, quickly devolved into one of the most pressing environmental and public health concerns in the modern world.”

Long-term exposure to certain types of PFAS, which can accumulate in the body over time, “have been linked to serious illnesses, including cancer, liver damage and high cholesterol,” according to Regan.

PFOA and PFOS will be limited at a maximum level of four parts per trillion, meaning any water system that identifies levels above that would need to notify residents and take actions to get levels at least down to at least that level. The EPA previously recommended that anything above 70 parts per trillion is considered unsafe, but it lowered that health advisory level last year.

There hasn’t been national testing to determine how many Americans have this level of the chemicals in their water, but the EPA estimates that 3,400-6,300 water systems serving 70-94 million people use water that contains PFAS levels above what will be allowed under this rule.

The agency says the rule will prevent thousands of deaths and reduce tens of thousands of illnesses attributable to PFAS if fully implemented.

The American Chemistry Council, a trade group that represents the industry that makes these chemicals, says it supports drinking water limits on PFOS and PFOA but disagrees with the science EPA used to decide on the maximum limits.

“PFOA and PFOS were phased out of production by our members more than eight years ago. We support restrictions on their use globally, and we support drinking water standards for PFOA and PFOS based on the best available science,” ACC said in a statement. “However, we have serious concerns with the underlying science used to develop these proposed MCLs and have previously challenged the EPA based on the process used to develop that science.”

Many advocates and experts applauded EPA’s rule as a critically important step but said they still want to see the agency regulate all 12,000 chemicals in the PFAS category and hold the companies who make the chemicals and caused PFAS pollution accountable.

“EPA’s groundbreaking proposal to regulate six PFAS ‘forever chemicals’ for the first time is crucially important. We have a five-alarm fire. Setting strong standards will help ensure the fundamental right of every family to have safe water flowing from their kitchen tap. We must crack down on PFAS polluters. They should be required to halt further pollution, clean up the contamination they’ve already caused, and pay to treat PFAS-contaminated drinking water,” Erik Olson, senior strategic director for health at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement.

Regan said the Biden administration has also made $9 billion available as a “shot in the harm” to help public water systems start to address this issue.

The EPA rule will be published for public comment and could be revised. Regan said he plans to finalize it by the end of this year.

Copyright © 2023, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.




Source link

GettyImages-1247689700-scaled-e1678331517521.jpg

Biden Pushes For Further Gun Control Measures Despite Current Agenda Facing Legal, Congressional Pushback

  • President Joe Biden continues to push for restrictive gun control measures, but many of his initiatives are tied up in court, subject to congressional review or widely opposed by Republican lawmakers.
  • Biden, who has already implemented extensive background checks, red flag law funding, pistol stabilizer rules, ghost gun rules and a “zero tolerance” policy for gun dealers, plans to introduce further gun control measures Tuesday.
  • “Biden has always had an anti-gun agenda and on this important constitutional issue has never let the courts, public opinion or the Bill of Rights get in his way,” Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) Founder and Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

President Joe Biden has ushered in a litany of restrictive gun control measures since taking office in 2021, but many of his initiatives are now tied up in court, subject to congressional review or widely opposed by lawmakers.

Through both the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act and the administration’s three-letter agencies, Biden has implemented extensive background checks, red flag law funding, pistol stabilizer rules, ghost gun rules and a “zero tolerance” policy for gun dealers; however, much of his work is now subject to congressional review and numerous lawsuits. Amidst legal battles over his current gun agenda, Biden is expected to announce additional gun regulations through Executive Order Tuesday, at the location of a mass shooting in Monterey Park, California, in January.

“Biden has always had an anti-gun agenda and on this important constitutional issue has never let the courts, public opinion or the Bill of Rights get in his way,” Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) Founder and Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb told the Daily Caller News Foundation. (RELATED: Biden’s Budget Proposes Massive Funding Increase For Federal Crackdown On Guns)

Biden, in collaboration with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosive (ATF), has imposed a series of gun restrictions on law-abiding Americans, Federal Firearm License (FFL) holders and gun manufacturers since taking office. In April 2022, the Biden administration, ATF and Department of Justice (DOJ) implemented a final rule for the “frame and receiver” of ghost guns aimed at tracking custom, unserialized firearms.

In November, Judge Reed O’Connor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled that the ATF could no longer enforce the ghost gun rule on firearm kit maker Defense Distributed. O’Connor issued a preliminary injunction against the rule, saying it is likely unconstitutional and causes an undue burden on the parts maker, according to the ruling.

“Enforcement efforts upset decades of ATF regulatory precedent against a public that has relied on that historic posture,” O’Connor wrote. “The liberty interests of law-abiding citizens wishing to engage in historically lawful conduct outweighs the Government’s competing interest in preventing prohibited persons from unlawfully possessing firearms.”

In February 2023, following the the ATF’s announcement of the pistol brace final rule, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Second Amendment advocacy group Gun Owners Of America (GOA) filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration and ATF saying the rule is “dangerous” and “unconstitutional,” according to a release.

“This is yet another attempt by the Biden administration to create a workaround to the U.S. Constitution and expand gun registration in America,” Paxton said. “There is absolutely no legal basis for ATF’s haphazard decision to try to change the long-standing classification for stabilizing braces, force registration on Americans, and then throw them in jail for ten years if they don’t quickly comply.”

In March, Paxton filed a motion for temporary injunction against the rule.

Since taking office, Biden has instructed the ATF to adopt a “zero tolerance” policy for gun dealers, leading FFL revocations to hit a 16-year high in 2022. The increase in license revocations, 92 in 2022 alone, is due to the new policy and the updated procedure that the ATF follows, as they no longer always go through a multi-step process, often opting to pull licenses for a multitude of “willful” violations.

“That’s not how regulatory agencies are supposed to work in the sector that they’re supposed to regulate. They are supposed to help the companies, they’re supposed to ensure compliance but they’re not supposed to punish and destroy an entire industry based on just political opposition or political distaste,” Gun Owners of America Director of Federal Affairs Aidan Johnston told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

In response to the ATF’s ghost gun rule, pistol stabilizer rule and “zero tolerance” policy, Republican Reps. Jim Jordan and Thomas Massie requested ATF Director Stephen Dettelbach testify before Congress in April.

“Just last year, the United States Supreme Court held in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency that under the major questions doctrine, ‘given both separation of powers principles and a practical understanding of legislative intent, the agency must point to ‘clear congressional authorization’ for the authority it claims,’” the Reps wrote.

“This ruling raises serious doubts about ATF’s ability to regulate pistol braces absent a clear mandate from Congress,” they added.

Though Biden has not been able to implement a ban on so-called “assault weapons,” it has not stopped his administration from pushing for one. Biden has made the call at multiple events and following several mass shootings in the early months of 2023.

Biden’s repetitive call for so-called “assault weapon” bans has left many Republican lawmakers uneasy, as a coalition of 15 Republican attorneys general sent a letter in February calling Biden out and opposing his plan to target gun rights.

The coalition questioned Biden’s definition of so-called “assault weapons,” further saying that his call for Congress to ban “assault weapons” is both “irresponsible and unconstitutional,” according to the letter. The coalition referred to Biden’s calls for an assault weapon ban “astonishing,” as there are over 100 million semi-automatic handguns and 45 million semi-automatic rifles in the United States possessed by law-abiding Americans.

Though many of Biden’s initiatives are now tied up in court, subject to congressional review or widely opposed by lawmakers, The president is set to announce a new list of gun control executive orders Tuesday at the location of the Monterey Park, California, mass shooting.

“This is just another chapter in Joe Biden’s war on gun rights. It is a diversion to the Democrat failure to keep Americans safe from violent criminals who are released without bail and are free to prey on us all,” Gottlieb told the DCNF.

Other state legislatures have been fighting Biden’s federal war on guns though different means. Missouri and Montana have opposed Biden’s gun agenda by implementing laws that prevent state governments from assisting with the enforcement of any federal gun laws.

Missouri is currently appealing an Obama appointed judge’s decision to strike down the law. The law will remain intact while the state appeals.

In Texas, Republican state Rep. Bryan Slaton had some “fun” with the federal government in February after introducing a House Committee Resolution that informed the federal government that all of the guns in many of Texas’s counties had been tragically lost in a series of alleged boating accidents. The resolution further notified the Biden administration, and any further administration, that any attempt to “buyback, confiscate or register” the firearms, will not be possible or necessary.

“There’s different ways to respond to federal overreach. And, you know, natural emotion, people get upset, angry, but at some point, my thoughts is, if they’re going to be disrespectful, maybe we should have fun with them,” Slaton told the DCNF. “In a day and time where people can claim to be anything they want and don’t need facts, well okay, fine. We had a series of alleged boating accidents.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.




Source link

Anfisa-Letyago-Web-Layout3.jpg

Vuse joins forces with Anfisa Letyago on “Street Covers”, a new platform uncovering local talent in music and art – Features

“The concept behind Street Covers resonates so much with me personally,” says Anfisa on the project. “Where we live and spend our time plays a central role in our lives. For me, Naples has formed such a significant part of my journey as an artist – the sounds, the smells, the people – it has all been intrinsic to my story. I’m looking forward to exploring and learning about different music scenes around the world, and to working with a line-up of incredible talent to develop music that represents their unique journeys of creative discovery.”

Read this next: Anfisa Letyago: “When you go outside your comfort zone, it can inspire you”

Anfisa in her role as Global Brand Ambassador will also support the Vuse Driven by Change initiative, offering underrepresented artists opportunities in the world of motorsport.

Brain Cannon adds: “Music is so emotive, everyone has a different relationship with it, so managing to capture the essence of a track within a piece of art is extremely special and something I’ve dedicated my entire life’s work to,” he continues. “I can’t wait to meet the five global artists and embark on this creative journey together, creating visual identities for a variety of genres of music. It’s going to an incredible challenge, and what a fantastic initiative to be a part of.”

John Beasley, BAT’s Global Director of Consumer Experience, added: “At Vuse we’re dedicated to discovering and championing unsung talent and we’re delighted to be reinforcing our commitment through the launch of Street Covers. Tapping into the cultural pulse of different cities around the world, we’ll unearth the most exciting local talent who sit outside of the algorithmically controlled mainstream, celebrating the fusion of music and art and reviving the artistry of cover art lost to the digital world, while putting these creative talents on a global stage for all to discover.”

Check out Vuse on Instagram

Vuse contains nicotine and is addictive. 18+ only.

Watch Making Your Mark with Anfisa Letyago below




Source link

Below-Deck-Captain-Lee.jpg

What’s the biggest tip on Below Deck?

Captain Lee on Below Deck Season 10
The Below Deck Season 10 crew received a huge tip on the recent episode. Pic credit: Bravo

Below Deck Season 10 is winding down and going out with a bang as the St. David crew earned a massive tip ahead of the finale episode.

Tips are a significant portion of the crew’s salary, so whether it’s good or bad, the tip always impacts the crew.

The standard tip ranges from $15,000 to $20,000 on the show, but occasionally it can be more or less.

On the most recent episode of Below Deck, Captain Lee Rosbach and his crew were treated with an unexpected tip amount.

This time it was on the high end as primary charter guest Jake left a whopping $40,000, with the crew declaring it was Jake’s way of making up for his pal Angel.

The tip amount has raised the question of whether that’s the biggest tip ever left on Below Deck, so let’s take a look.

What’s the biggest tip on Below Deck?

Season 10 of Below Deck has seen some pretty good tips aside from the $40,000 tip. There were a couple of $30,000 tips, making the season one of the top earners.

And yes, the $40,000 tip is the highest left on Below Deck. The honor previously went to Below Deck Season 5 charter guest Timothy Sykes, who left $35,000.

Although it’s worth noting, Timothy left that amount during his second stint on the show. The first time Timothy actually took money off the tip, $5,000, because he felt chef Ben Robinson screwed up Timothy’s 19-year-old date’s food.

$40,000 is quite the tip, and it had social media buzzing after Captain dropped the news

Below Deck fans react to $40,000 tip

Twitter was on fire, with Below Deck viewers speaking out after the massive tip. Captain Lee even got in on the action after one Twitter user commented it was the biggest tip they saw on the show.

“Me as well, said Happily,” wrote the beloved captain.

Captain Lee tweet about tip.
Pic credit: @capthlr/Twitter

Another user commented on the record while welcoming Captain Lee back to the show.

A different one loved that the most significant tip in Below Deck history was left under Captain Lee’s helm, not when Captain Sandy Yawn was filling in for him.

One Twitter user chose a cat GIF to show shock and excitement over the massive tip.

There’s one more episode left in Below Deck Season 10, as the crew has a quick one-day charter and final night out. A reunion show typically follows the finale; however, the rumor mill has been buzzing that the reunion show was canceled, so stay tuned for more details on that.

The good news is that Below Deck Sailing Yacht Season 4 should be up next, and Captain Glenn Shephard has already teased what fans can expect.

Below Deck airs Mondays at 8/7c on Bravo. Seasons 1-9 are streaming on Peacock.


Source link

1250-6f60838f814d527b3163a851ddde9604.jpg

State Theatre New Jersey Presents MUSE Featuring Cirque FLIP Fabrique

State Theatre New Jersey Presents MUSE Featuring Cirque FLIP Fabrique

The fully renovated State Theatre New Jersey presents MUSE featuring Cirque FLIP Fabrique on Wednesday, March 22 at 7:30pm. Tickets range from $29-$59.

From Québec City, Canada, Cirque FLIP Fabrique is known globally for their contemporary circus productions. Performed at the world-renowned Edinburgh Festival Fringe in 2022, FLIP Fabrique’s 10th production MUSE explores gender identity in circus style. Through acrobatics, MUSE attempts to answer the question of “What does it mean to be a woman?” To showcase that there is more than one answer, the performers will explore gender archetypes they may not identify with, such as choosing to wear a football uniform or ballet outfit.

The touring production will feature circus artists Jérémie Arsenault (diablo), Kata Banhegyi (jump rope), Hugo Duquette (trapeze), Anne-Marie Godin (trapeze), Frédérique Hamel (trampoline), Evelyne Paquin-Lanthier (trapeze), and Cédrik Pinault (trampoline). MUSE also features live onstage vocals by singer Flávia Nascimento.

MUSE is directed by Maxime Robin and Sophie Thibeault with artistic direction by Bruno Gagnon. The show features an original score by Millimetrik, lyrics by Valérie Clio, and arrangements by Guillaume Tondreau. MUSE also includes scenic design by Vanessa Cadrin, light design by Kevin Dubois, makeup by Nathalie Simard, and costumes by Erica Schmitz and Camila Comin.

For tickets, more information, or group discounts, call State Theatre Guest Services at 732-246-SHOW (7469) or visit online at STNJ.org. State Theatre Guest Services, located at 15 Livingston Ave, New Brunswick NJ, is open by phone and email only, Tuesday through Friday from 11am to 5pm. For in-person purchases, Guest Services is open Tuesday through Friday from 12pm to 4:30pm. Additional ticket and transaction fees may apply.


Source link